Get a clear 0–100 facial harmony score, the measurements behind it, and practical context for your photo—free, in seconds.
Use a clear, front-facing photo in good light. Remove glasses and include one face.
JPG, PNG, WebP, HEIC up to 10MB
An attractiveness test is a facial analysis tool that measures geometric features in a photograph to calculate a beauty score. These tests analyze facial symmetry, proportions, and ratios to provide a numerical attractiveness rating, typically on a 0-100 scale.
Modern AI attractiveness tests use computer vision to detect 478 facial landmarks, then calculate metrics like bilateral symmetry, facial thirds balance, facial fifths balance, and golden ratio proximity. The measurements are combined using a weighted formula to produce a single attractiveness score.
Research shows facial symmetry correlates with perceived attractiveness, with studies by Rhodes et al. (1998) demonstrating symmetry influences harmony perception. However, attractiveness tests measure only static geometry and miss expression, movement, styling, and personal preferences that shape real-world attraction.
Key insight: Attractiveness tests provide objective geometric measurements, not subjective beauty judgments. A score reflects how closely your photo matches specific ratio targets, not how attractive you are to people in real life.
Your result shows the measurements behind your score, so you can see which parts of facial geometry are most balanced in this photo.
0-100 weighted measurement
Your score classification
35% of total score
25% of total score
25% of total score
15% of total score
Your report includes the exact formula, strongest measured signal, and one area to understand next.
Closest alignment across this tool's four geometry components.
Strong measured harmony, with only modest variation across components.
Above-average measured balance with identifiable areas of variation.
A mixed geometry profile where photo conditions and individual components matter more than the headline number.
Further from this tool's selected geometric targets, but distinctive features often hold the strongest appeal. Many faces that score here are highly attractive to people—this tool only measures distance from a narrow set of ratio conventions.
These tiers describe the degree of geometric balance in this photo. They are not rankings of personal worth or social attractiveness.
Your score is a weighted sum of four geometric components. The components are informed by facial-aesthetics research, while the exact weights are this tool's disclosed production calibration — not a scientifically universal formula or a prediction of how any person will rate you.
How closely paired landmarks on the left and right sides mirror across a fitted facial midline. Bilateral symmetry is widely studied in perceived attractiveness; 35% is this tool's disclosed product-formula weight, not a universal scientific constant.
How evenly the visible landmark window divides into upper, middle, and lower sections. The target is adjusted for MediaPipe's upper-forehead landmark rather than pretending the model can see the true hairline.
How the face divides horizontally into five eye-width segments — ear to outer eye, outer to inner eye (one eye width), inner-eye gap (one eye width), and so on across to the other ear. Fifths balance is a centuries-old canon for upper-face proportion.
How closely your face length-to-width ratio matches phi (1.618), adjusted for the visible landmark window. It has the lowest weight because one length-to-width target captures less geometry than the bilateral and multi-section balance measures.
Formula:
Score = (Symmetry × 0.35) + (Facial Thirds × 0.25) + (Facial Fifths × 0.25) + (Golden Ratio × 0.15)
The score is a reproducible measurement formula for this tool. It is not a universal definition of beauty.
Cross-cultural agreement on symmetry preferences (Rhodes et al., 1998)
Facial landmarks detected by MediaPipe for precision analysis
Core geometric components: symmetry, thirds, fifths, golden ratios
This tool measures geometric features that research has associated with facial perception. These associations do not establish causation, nor do they account for the full complexity of human attractiveness.
"Facial symmetry has been found to be one of the most robust predictors of attractiveness judgments across cultures, though it represents only one component of a complex multi-dimensional perception."
This tool measures visible geometry in a single photo. It cannot capture the full picture of attractiveness or identity.
Lighting and lens choice can change measurements
Angle and expression can affect symmetry readings
One static photo cannot represent a person fully
Ratio targets reflect selected measurement conventions, not universal ideals
This is not medical, diagnostic, or professional advice
Results may vary between photos of the same person
The tool cannot assess skin quality, texture, or other visual attributes reliably
Use this tool for curiosity and entertainment. Do not use it to make judgments about yourself or others, or as a substitute for professional advice.
Follow these guidelines to get the most reliable geometric analysis from your photo.
Look directly at the camera for the most accurate measurement
Avoid smiling or exaggerated expressions that can affect symmetry
Pull back hair so all facial features are clearly visible
Use a distance of at least arm's length to minimize lens distortion
Avoid harsh shadows or bright spots that can obscure features
Selected academic research on facial perception and attractiveness
These references are provided for educational context. This tool's measurements and scoring are not endorsed by the cited authors or institutions.
Explore other facial analysis tools using the same 478-landmark detection